However, under the conditions of subsidies, such motives disappear, because receiving more income from the budget does not require creating a better product.is appropriate based on its goal, and the results achieved at the macro and micro levels. The most important indicator of development at the macro level is the country's position in the club football rankings, and it reflects the overall success achieved at the micro level.
Chart 1 : Ranking of UEFA member country championships taiyuan mobile database (from bottom to top) Source: uefa.com Before the implementation of the budget program, Georgia was ranked 19th from the bottom in the UEFA member country championships ranking, with a position of 36. As of 2024, Georgia is ranked 46th in the ranking, which is 9th from the bottom. Thus, after the start of funding clubs from the Football Development Budget Program, the ranking of the championship in which these clubs participate has deteriorated.
The reason for the decline in Georgia's position is the deterioration of the results of Georgian clubs in European tournaments. At the micro level, the effectiveness of the budget program can be assessed using other indicators. Such a measure of success is the financial performance of the clubs. This approach to program evaluation is especially relevant in the context where temporary budget support is intended to ensure the financial stability of the clubs.
The evaluation of the football development program
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:19 am