Who can bring the user the biggest
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2025 4:50 am
Companies operating in the industry have started competing with each other to see and most accurate result. Adobe has come up with an extension for Photoshop and Illustrator called Generative Fill, which can easily calculate empty space based on a few pixels and visually supplement a poorly cropped photo, for example. For small things, these "AI toys" are really great helpers , and for example, I use the extended ChatGPT today to generate special parts of visuals that are not in photo banks and I would spend hours designing them manually." AI can help, that's a fact. "However, artificial intelligence is not always perfect, which is why most designers, including me, use it as a useful assistant , not as something that should do our work for us.
Still, despite its rapid development, artificial intelligence does not have the slightest emotion that we as designers put into our designs. For example, if we use it to create entire complex and intricate visuals, campaigns or identities, its results are often generic, without ideas and without a hint of originality." "Many creative companies or studios are Armenia Mobile Database gradually, at least for now, giving up on artificial intelligence, because despite its unquestionable advantage, it is often a nuisance for designers, and therefore they use it only from time to time. For now, it seems that until artificial intelligence has a heart and emotions and can think for itself, it cannot replace a person working in a creative field.
So, good as a helper, not so much as an independent worker. Chapter 5. → What do search engines think? Search engine content evaluation has also evolved. At first, it was said that Google would recognize AI-generated text and would definitely not evaluate it positively, then someone came up with a tool that detected AI-generated texts and thereby degraded them. It was a struggle. Today, things are a little different in the SERP. The company itself stated: “The goal of Google’s ranking systems is to reward original, high-quality content that exhibits qualities we call EEAT (expertise, experience, authoritativeness, trustworthiness).
Still, despite its rapid development, artificial intelligence does not have the slightest emotion that we as designers put into our designs. For example, if we use it to create entire complex and intricate visuals, campaigns or identities, its results are often generic, without ideas and without a hint of originality." "Many creative companies or studios are Armenia Mobile Database gradually, at least for now, giving up on artificial intelligence, because despite its unquestionable advantage, it is often a nuisance for designers, and therefore they use it only from time to time. For now, it seems that until artificial intelligence has a heart and emotions and can think for itself, it cannot replace a person working in a creative field.
So, good as a helper, not so much as an independent worker. Chapter 5. → What do search engines think? Search engine content evaluation has also evolved. At first, it was said that Google would recognize AI-generated text and would definitely not evaluate it positively, then someone came up with a tool that detected AI-generated texts and thereby degraded them. It was a struggle. Today, things are a little different in the SERP. The company itself stated: “The goal of Google’s ranking systems is to reward original, high-quality content that exhibits qualities we call EEAT (expertise, experience, authoritativeness, trustworthiness).