Here is the first half of a difficult question
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 4:01 am
You deserve the consequences of what you tolerate. Think about that for a second. What does that mean in the context of cybersecurity and security operations?
If companies collectively turn a blind eye to vague security policies and don’t bother enforcing standards designed solely to protect their networks, then they deserve the pain that will inevitably follow. If companies don’t want to cultivate user policies because they annoy users, then they deserve the pain that will inevitably follow when their systems are inevitably compromised. If companies tolerate vendors selling them technology that has backdoors hard-coded by default and no way to monitor or patch the device, then they shouldn’t be surprised when an IoT threat hits their network or any other network connected to the server.
about the ills that come from tolerating saudi arabia whatsapp data problems. Its solution requires responsibility and willpower:
Tolerating overvalued technology means we won't get the results we want (or what we paid for).
If we fail to enforce our policies, we fail our users, our management, and our shareholders.
If we don't align our strategy with the business, we shouldn't be surprised when we are not involved in decision making and our initiatives are ignored.
We must take steps to stop getting into trouble and accepting less-than-winning results. All it takes is one thing: raising the bar of expectations.
Here's what needs to be done to help an organization solve this difficult issue. No artificial intelligence is needed here:
If companies have a user policy that says "we track your activity and monitor your actions on our network," it needs to be enforced.
Do not connect smart devices to the network without having a plan for their technical support and installation of patches.
Instill in your C-level management that security is not just a part of business – it is critical to success in the modern world. Don’t take a back seat.
Analyze and understand the nuances, technical needs, and context of any technology your team is considering using. Don't make decisions based on proof of concept alone, assuming everything will work out (it won't).
Things can go well for you or badly for you. And the choice is up to us and how much trouble we are willing to stomach before we change the situation and put an end to tolerance.
If companies collectively turn a blind eye to vague security policies and don’t bother enforcing standards designed solely to protect their networks, then they deserve the pain that will inevitably follow. If companies don’t want to cultivate user policies because they annoy users, then they deserve the pain that will inevitably follow when their systems are inevitably compromised. If companies tolerate vendors selling them technology that has backdoors hard-coded by default and no way to monitor or patch the device, then they shouldn’t be surprised when an IoT threat hits their network or any other network connected to the server.
about the ills that come from tolerating saudi arabia whatsapp data problems. Its solution requires responsibility and willpower:
Tolerating overvalued technology means we won't get the results we want (or what we paid for).
If we fail to enforce our policies, we fail our users, our management, and our shareholders.
If we don't align our strategy with the business, we shouldn't be surprised when we are not involved in decision making and our initiatives are ignored.
We must take steps to stop getting into trouble and accepting less-than-winning results. All it takes is one thing: raising the bar of expectations.
Here's what needs to be done to help an organization solve this difficult issue. No artificial intelligence is needed here:
If companies have a user policy that says "we track your activity and monitor your actions on our network," it needs to be enforced.
Do not connect smart devices to the network without having a plan for their technical support and installation of patches.
Instill in your C-level management that security is not just a part of business – it is critical to success in the modern world. Don’t take a back seat.
Analyze and understand the nuances, technical needs, and context of any technology your team is considering using. Don't make decisions based on proof of concept alone, assuming everything will work out (it won't).
Things can go well for you or badly for you. And the choice is up to us and how much trouble we are willing to stomach before we change the situation and put an end to tolerance.