Types of matrix organizational structures

[chandonar0]

A matrix structure created in ClickUp Whiteboard via Allaeddine Djaidani

It is worth mentioning that the matrix organizational structure unites and balances several types of organizational structures. It provides project managers with a new chain of command, in addition to functional managers, which is why some like to call it a two-boss matrix.

When working on large-scale projects involving a diverse set of talent, project managers:

Manage talent across all departments and build strong and diverse project teams,
Maximize the resources already at your disposal,
Help everyone realize how essential teamwork is, and encourage dominican republic phone number data team members to collaborate, communicate, and deliver on time and within budget.


Matrix organizational structures can be weak, balanced, or strong, depending on how power is deployed between project managers and functional managers.

However, one should not get carried away by the names, as a weak matrix is ​​not necessarily worse than a strong one, which differs from project to project, from company to company, and these roles are rather fluid.

Project managers have very little authority and decision-making power in a weak matrix. This type of matrix is ​​called weak because the functional managers are in charge of the project budget and schedule, and the authority of the project managers is extremely limited.

In balanced matrix structures, team members report to department and project managers with equal power and authority. The balanced matrix may be the best, as it eliminates potential clashes between leaders, keeps communication open, and facilitates the successful delivery of the project.

As you can already deduce, in a solid matrix, project managers have more authority than functional managers to properly allocate resources and plan budgets with complete freedom.